In California, warning labels have become so commonplace that ... has effectively swayed dozens of companies from using chemicals known to cause cancer, reproductive harm or birth defects.

Under the 1986 right-to-know law, also known as Prop 65, products that could expose people to harmful amounts of those chemicals must carry warning labels. Critics had long mocked the measure ...

For nearly 40 years, a controversial California law has required companies to place warning labels on their products alerting consumers to the potential health threats posed by chemicals ...

More information can potentially help, which is why Prop 65 was amended in 2016 to mandate that labels name at least one harmful chemical ingredient that triggered the warning. Consumers can look ...

Products that contain certain dyes and chemicals would be required to have warning labels. Currently, companies can add new “Generally Recognized as Safe” chemicals to food without any type of ...

A bill that’s passed the Iowa Senate would block lawsuits against farm chemical companies based ... to warn of potential health risks if product labels meet federal guidelines.

In California, warning labels have become so commonplace ... Consumer advocates have long argued that requiring companies to label the toxic chemicals in their products would steer people away ...