Senator Paul’s argument rests on several bits of supposed evidentiary information: That the bill imposes “sweeping ...

A federal appeals court in San Francisco has heard arguments on whether the Trump administration should return control of ...

A federal appeals court in San Francisco was set to hear arguments Tuesday afternoon on whether the Trump administration should return control of National Guard troops to California after they were ...

Since June 7, Trump has deployed more than 4,000 National Guard members and 700 Marines to Los Angeles against the state's ...

Over the next few weeks, the Supreme Court will release its final opinions of the term, including a decision that could help ...

Recently, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in Labcorp v. Davis. During oral arguments, the court appeared to get ...

The charge's definition as applied to Noor is also rare: that he caused Damond's death "by perpetuating an act eminently dangerous to others and evincing a depraved mind." Noor's attorney argued ...

Audio of the oral argument is available at the Court of International ... As Jeff put it, an umpire doesn't have to precisely define the strike zone to call a ball on a pitch that's so far from ...

John Guillory sets out to explain what close reading is and “why it has been so difficult to define” by way of a fascinating anthropology of reading that makes available new arguments in ...

The California Supreme Court, in Cassim v. Allstate Ins. Co., has also adopted a narrow definition of what type of golden rule argument is out of bounds. In Cassim, asking jurors to imagine having ...

The UK Supreme Court has unanimously and unambiguously backed the argument that the definition of a woman in the Equality Act should be based on biological sex. Reading out the ruling, Lord Hodge ...

That argument is that someone who was born a man ... appointing person to ask a candidate to prove whether they meet the definition of woman in the Act”. Gender critics took the case to the ...