News

Apple has released the full list of iPhone models supported by its new iOS 26 software update, here‘s what is and isn’t compatible.
Apple’s iPhone 16 Pro Max, powered by the A18 Pro chipset, is undoubtedly a flagship device. However, the premium smartphone market in 2025 is fiercely competitive and if you are curious about the top ...
The iPhone 17 Pro and Pro Max, expected in September 2025, will feature significant upgrades. A triple 48MP camera, larger displays, and the A19 Pro chip are anticipated. The Pro Max may have a ...
iPhone 17 series, launching in September 2025, is expected to bring major upgrades in design, camera, and performance. iPhone 17 Pro Max and iPhone 17 are expected to launch in September 2025 with ...
the iPhone 17 Pro Max. From what we know so far, both phones will share much of the same specs, yet they’ll still differ in size, battery capacity and, of course, price. Here’s a clear look at ...
The anticipation for Apple's iPhone 17 series is growing, particularly for the Pro Max model, expected to launch in September. Leaks suggest a shift from a titanium frame to a lighter aluminium and ...
With the expected launch of the iPhone 17 series—including the iPhone 17 Pro Max, iPhone 17 Air, iPhone 17 Pro, and the regular iPhone 17—just a few months away in September 2025, a surge of ...
From AED 3,799 onwards Premium versions like the Pro Max could cost over USD 2,300 in global markets due to taxes and import fees. Before the iPhone 17 takes the spotlight, it is worth recalling ...
Apple is gearing up to launch the iPhone 17 Pro Max in September 2025. The device promises significant upgrades in performance and camera capabilities. A new display and AI-powered features are ...
This time, Apple is likely to introduce four models: the iPhone 17, iPhone 17 Pro, iPhone 17 Pro Max, and an all-new addition to the lineup — the iPhone 17 Air. Among these, the Air variant ...
However, it’s competing against its thick Apple rival, the iPhone 16 Pro Max. As we settle into the middle of 2025, it’s survival of the fittest — or should we say, “thinnest”?