Andy Warhol's Prince series is in the crosshairs of Supreme Court oral arguments debating the nature of what qualifies as "transformative art" under the First Amendment.

Andy Warhol's posters of Prince may have been works of art, but they infringed a copyrighted photo, the high court says. Supreme Court rejects Andy Warhol's use of Prince photo - Los Angeles Times ...

The Supreme Court sided with a photographer who said the late Andy Warhol should have honored her copyright on a photo when creating an iconic image of Prince.

The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that the late Andy Warhol infringed on a photographer’s copyright when he created a series of silk screens based on a photograph of the late singer Prince.

Andy Warhol violated a photographer’s copyright when he used her picture of Prince as the basis for 13 silkscreen portraits nearly 40 years ago, the Supreme Court ruled.

We can get insight into that first transformation of art into fArt, circa 1500, from the research of Alexander Nagel, an art historian at New York University’s Institute of Fine Arts.

Intellectual Property. Supreme Court: Andy Warhol's Prince Prints Not 'Transformative' Enough for Fair Use The case could have long-term implications for how broadly fair use can be applied.

The Supreme Court has sided with individual artists — but against art itself. In a fascinating copyright decision that transcended ideological lines, the court held that Andy Warhol’s ...

For months, the art world has waited with bated breath for the Supreme Court to issue a verdict in the closely followed case of the Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts versus Lynn Goldsmith ...

Lynn Goldsmith poses for a photo with attorney Lisa Blatt on the steps of the Supreme Court for the Warhol v.Goldsmith case on October 12, 2022 in Washington, D.C. Photo: Mickey Osterreicher/Getty ...