three of which are actually remakes from 2008's Call of Duty: World at War. Let's take a look at how the maps have changed with this side-by-side comparison. For more than 13 years, Call of Duty's ...

Powered by Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare technology, Call of Duty: World at War brings an uncensored edge ... in the boots of Private Miller, across exotic locales such as the island of Peleliu ...

Certainly not by having someone else do the next step for Call of Duty and having that step be an about face that returns you to the well-trodden mud, trenches and broken landscape of World War II ...

So now that "Call of Duty: World at War" (Activision Publishing Inc., Xbox 360, $59.99) is out, was the despair warranted? Yes and no. "World at War" is a respectable game in its own right ...

Which Call of Duty reigns supreme? Modern Warfare or World at War? Master debaters Charlie Barratt and Chris Antista are picking their trenches and laying it all on the line to help you decide.

Call of Duty: World at War is a serious contender in the world of Wii first-person shooters. Click here to watch sniper mission.

GameSpot may get a commission from retail offers. Call of Duty: World at War is a lot like its predecessor, Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare. In most respects, this is a good thing. The guns are ...

Right at the very start of World at War, you're a helpless prisoner of ... may be a more accurate description. If the early Call of Duty games were aping Spielberg, this is videogaming in the ...

Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare was a huge hit ... fixing complaints from COD3 and focused on important battles in World War II that hadn’t been touched on yet. World at War focuses on battles ...

and it made for some really big shoes for Call of Duty: World at War to fill. If you've been living in Antarctica the past year and haven't heard, then yes, World at War returns back to the series ...